Citations

1. Buckendahl, C., Ferdous, A. & Gerrow, J. (2010). Recommending cut scores with a subset of items: An empirical illustration. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 15(6). Available online: http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=15&n=6. 
2. Davis, S. & Buckendahl, C., & Davis. S. (under review). Implications of random ordering on the bookmark standard setting method. International Journal of Testing. 
3. Arcot Sadanand, N., Samal, A., Soh, L., & Buckendahl, C. (under review). An adaptive placement test for introductory computer science courses. Assessment and Evaluation in High Education. 
4. Davis, S., Buckendahl, C. & Plake, B. (2008). When adaptation is not an option: An application of multilingual standard setting. Journal of Educational Measurement, 45(3), 287-304. 
5. Norman, R. & Buckendahl, C. (2008). Determining sufficient measurement opportunities when using multiple cut scores. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 27(1), 37-46. 
6. O’Neill, T., Buckendahl, C., Taylor, L., & Plake, B. (2007). Recommending a nursing-specific passing standard for the IELTS examination. Language Assessment Quarterly, 4(4), 295-317. 
7. Hammond, D. & Buckendahl, C. (2006). Measurement trends in clinical licensure testing programs. Journal of the American Dental Association, 137, 30-42. 
8. Buckendahl, C. (2005). Practical and perceived challenges to instructionally supportive accountability tests. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 3(3), 188-201. 
9. Yang, Y., Buckendahl, C., Juszkiewicz, P., & Bhola, D. (2005). Evaluating computer automated scoring: Issues, methods, and an empirical illustration. Journal of Applied Testing Technology. Available online http://www.testpublishers.org/atp_journal.htm. 
10. Buckendahl, C., Huynh, H., Siskind, T., & Saunders, J. (2005). A case study of vertically-moderated standard setting for a state science assessment program. Applied Measurement in Education, 18(1), 83-98. 
11. Boss, T., Endorf, D., & Buckendahl, C. (2005). Developing a local assessment system for state accountability: A district’s reflections. The Researcher, 19(1), 32-41.

1. Buckendahl, C. & Davis, S. (in preparation). Setting passing standards for credentialing examinations. In G. J. Cizek (ed.) Setting performance standards: Concepts, methods, and perspectives (2^nd ed.). Taylor & Francis. 
2. Davis, S. & Buckendahl C. (in press). Integration of cognitive demand into licensure and certification exam development. In G. Schraw (Ed.). Assessment of higher order thinking skills. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. 
3. Buckendahl, C. & Foley, B. (in press). High stakes uses of intelligence tests. In J. Bovaird, C. Buckendahl, & K. Geisinger (Eds.). Contemporary uses of high stakes educational tests. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. 
4. Buckendahl, C., Davis, S., Plake, B., Sireci, S., Hambleton, R., Zenisky, A. & Wells, C (2009). Evaluation of the National Assessment of Educational Progress: Final Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. 
5. Buckendahl, C. & Plake, B. (2006). Evaluating Tests. In Haladyna, T. & Downing, S. (Ed.), Handbook of Test Development (pp.725-738). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. 
6. Buckendahl, C. & Hunt, R. (2005). Whose Rules? The relation between the “rules” and “laws” of testing. In R. P. Phelps (Ed.), Defending Standardized Testing (pp.147-158). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

1. Buckendahl, C., Domaleski, C., Taylor, M., & Willhoft, J. (June, 2010). Improving the coherence of content and performance standards in state assessment systems. Presentation at the annual National Conference on Student Assessment. Detroit, MI. 
2. Buckendahl, C., Eberhart, D., Fiandaca, G., & Jensen, J. (June, 2010). Conversations around reporting test results: What are the issues, what’s new, what’s next? Presentation at the annual National Conference on Student Assessment. Detroit, MI.
3. Buckendahl, C. & Davis. S. (May, 2010). Evaluating the appropriateness and use of domain critical errors. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Denver, CO.
4. Henderson-Montero, D. & Buckendahl, C. (May, 2010). Psychometric challenges in a rapidly changing environment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Denver, CO.
5. Buckendahl, C. (February, 2010). Using security data to inform legal, policy and psychometric considerations. Presentation at the annual meeting of the Association of Test Publishers. Orlando, FL.
6. Buckendahl, C. (June, 2009). An audit of the NAEP assessment lifecycle. In C. Buckendahl (organizer), Findings from the evaluation of the National Assessment of Educational Progress. Presentation at the annual National Conference on Student Assessment. Los Angeles, CA.
7. Buckendahl, C. (June, 2009). Designing an evaluation of consequences in a state assessment program. In S. Davis (moderator), Developing and evaluating consequential validity evidence for a state assessment program. Presentation at the annual National Conference on Student Assessment. Los Angeles, CA.
8. Buckendahl, C. (April, 2009). Evaluating rater agreement for credentialing exams with performance items: Integrating policy and practice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego, CA.
9. Davis. S. & Buckendahl, C (April, 2009). Integration of cognitive demand into credentialing exam development. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. San Diego, CA.
10. Buckendahl, C. (February, 2009). Reactions to the CBAL project. Presentation at the annual meeting of the Association of Test Publishers. Rancho Mirage, CA.
11. Buckendahl, C. & Davis, S. (July, 2008). Setting cut scores for a clinical skills licensure test: A comparison of methods. Paper presented at the International Test Commission Conference. Liverpool, U.K.
12. Buckendahl, C. & Davis, S. (July, 2008). Communicating the results of a psychometric audit. Paper presented as part of the symposium, Communicating psychometrics to policymakers: Challenges from the 2004-07 evaluation of the National Assessment of Educational Progress, at the International Test Commission Conference. Liverpool, U.K.
13. Davis, S. & Buckendahl, C. (July, 2008). The impact of randomly ordering an ordered item booklet in an application of the bookmark standard setting method. Paper presented at the International Test Commission Conference. Liverpool, U.K.
14. Buckendahl, C. (June, 2008). Considerations when defining the role of contractors in a state assessment program. Presentation at the annual meeting of the Council of Chief State School Officers. Orlando, FL.
15. Davis, S. & Buckendahl, C. (March, 2008). A proposed framework for evaluating alignment studies. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York, NY.
16. Buckendahl, C., Ferdous, A., & Gerrow, J. (March, 2008). Setting cut scores with subsets of items: An empirical illustration. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York, NY.
17. Buckendahl, C. (March, 2008). Designing the 2004-08 evaluation of NAEP. Invited presentation to the NAEP Studies Special Interest Group as part of the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New York, NY.
18. Chin, T., Rodeck, E., Buckendahl, C., & Foley, B. (March, 2008). The impact of consensus on alignment judgments. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York, NY.
19. Badgett, B., Davis, S., & Buckendahl, C. (March, 2008). Alignment in higher education: Matching assessments to program goals of an online university. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New York, NY.
20. Buckendahl, C. (June, 2007). Evaluating computer automated scoring methods for writing assessments. Presentation at the annual meeting of the Council of Chief State School Officers. Nashville, TN.
21. Buckendahl, C. & Davis, S. (April, 2007). Mitigation of item degradation. Presentation at the annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychologists. New York City, NY.
22. Buckendahl, C. (April, 2007). Psychometrics in the courtroom: A matter of life and death? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago, IL.
23. Davis, S. & Buckendahl, C. (April, 2007). Evaluating NCLB’s peer review process: A comparison of state compliance decisions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago, IL.
24. Irwin, P., Buckendahl, C., & Poggio, A. (April, 2007). Examinee-centered standard setting: An alternative approach. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago, IL.
25. Buckendahl, C. (March, 2007). Evaluating clinical examinations in dentistry and dental hygiene. Presentation at the annual mid-year meeting of the American Association of Dental Examiners. Chicago, IL.
26. Egan, K. & Buckendahl, C. (February, 2007). Philosophies and methods of standard setting. Workshop presented at the annual meeting of the Association of Test Publishers. Palm Springs, CA.
27. Buckendahl, C., Blackhurst, A., & Rodeck, E. (July, 2006). Adaptation within a language: Considerations for standard setting. Paper presented at the International Test Commission Conference. Brussels, Belgium.
28. Davis, S., Buckendahl, C., & Plake, B. (July, 2006). When adaptation is not an option: An application of bilingual standard setting. Paper presented at the International Test Commission Conference. Brussels, Belgium.
29. Gatti, G. & Buckendahl, C. (April, 2006). On correctly classifying examinees. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco, CA.
30. Buckendahl, C. (June, 2005). Computer adaptive testing in state assessment (Organizer/Moderator). Presentation at the annual Large Scale Assessment Conference. San Antonio, TX.
31. Buckendahl, C. (April, 2005). Whose rules? The relationship between the “rules” and “laws” of testing. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, QB.
32. Plake, B., Impara, J., Buckendahl, C., & Ferdous, A. (April, 2005). Setting multiple performance standards using the yes/no method: An alternative item mapping procedure. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Montreal, QB. 

1. Davis, S., & Buckendahl, C. (under review). A proposed framework for evaluating alignment studies. Educational Measurement: Issues  and Practice. 
2. Davis, S., Buckendahl, C., Gerrow, J. (under review). Evaluating panelists’ Bookmark standard setting judgments: The impact of random item ordering. International Journal of Testing. 
3. Bandalos, D., Davis, S. & Ferster, A. (in press). Validity Arguments for High-Stakes Testing and Accountability Systems. In J. Bovaird, C. Buckendahl, & K. Geisinger (Eds.). Contemporary uses of high stakes tests. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. 
4. Davis, S., Buckendahl, C. & Plake, B. (2008). When adaptation is not an option: An application of multilingual standard setting. Journal of Educational Measurement, 45(3), 287-304. 
5. Pastor, D. A., Barron, K. E., Miller, B.J., & Davis, S. L. (2007). A Latent Profile Analysis of College Students’ Achievement Goal Orientation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 8-47.

1. Davis, S. & Buckendahl C. (in press). Integration of cognitive demand into licensure and certification exam development. In G. Schraw (Ed.). Assessment of higher order thinking skills. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.